Conservatives Still Fear The Influence Of George Soros

George Soros has a reputation for backing some of the most liberal and difficult to complete good causes in the world; a good example of the difficult causes Soros backs is his determination to play a part in the repeal of the Citizens United Supreme Court decision many feels has robbed U.S. politics of its freedom and democratic nature. Soros may be seen as the main backer of causes even those founding charitable groups know are difficult to complete but he is also well known for providing his backing to many of the best-known political personalities on the left of U.S. politics and learn more about George Soros.

One of the major problems many in U.S. politics have with George Soros is his belief in a liberal agenda much more extreme than those he shares a bond with as a backer of the democratic party in the U.S. Business Insider reports the Hungarian-born Holocaust survivor has been identified as the major source of left-leaning funding for what many conservatives see as extreme movements and organizations who are looking to affect change in the U.S. within areas such as criminal justice and social change and more information click here.

A number of right-leaning media outlets including Fox News and Breitbart have been extremely outspoken in their criticism of the founder of Soros Fund Management with many political experts explaining their belief in the anti-Semitic roots of this criticism. Conspiracy theories have surrounded the role of George Soros in U.S. politics since his decision to back Democratic John Kerry in the U.S. Presidential election of 2004 against incumbent Republican, President George W. Bush. The $27 million Soros pledged to Kerry’s campaign was almost matched by the $25 million Politico reports the hedge fund manager provided for the campaign of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2016 and George Soros’s lacrosse camp.

The Open Society Foundations reports George Soros has dedicated his work as a philanthropist to overcoming the totalitarian and fascist regimes the former refugee lived beneath the rule of throughout his childhood. In 2004, Soros created a stir and prompted conservative outrage when he compared the ambitions of the Bush Administration to that of Hitler’s Nazi Germany; George Soros has been reported to have expressed his displeasure with the rhetoric of then-candidate Donald Trump for President and accused by conservatives of funding the protests following the election of Trump to The White House. In fact, George Soros has backed a number groups dedicated to bringing social justice to the U.S. for a number of years and saw many of these groups come together in Washington and across the U.S. to fight the rising power of right-wing groups in positions of political power and Follow him Twitter.

More Visit: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=977

Purpose of Comparative Law in Constitution Building

Comparative law in a broader sense is the study of different legal systems. The study is purposely meant to identify the similarities and the differences between the systems. Additionally, it is also intended to enlighten and help in the public relations of different sovereign countries. Comparative Law can also be defined as a method of studying the legal cultures of different states. The study of the law began as a way of helping learners understand the foreign legal systems. Today the law has played a significant role in international harmonization and unification of the global laws. In the new age of globalization and economic dependence, the comparative Law has played an important Law in bringing standardization and a better world order.  Click here and read more.

The comparative law can be looked in from two distinct categories. The first type is the macro- comparison. In this category, it’s all inclusive. It’s a study of the entire Legal systems. The other group is called micro-comparison. In this class, the law is reviewed shallowly and goes to a specific legal system or particular Problem.

There are many purposes of which the Law is used. First, comparative law is used to inform national Law making process. It is also used to aid judges in solving and answering difficult questions. The law also increases Knowledge and brings a base of unification.

The study of the modern comparative law can be traced from the 18th century Europe. The comparative approach of law was first documented by Montesquieu who was recognized as the founding Father. In the year 1869, the first course of study was introduced in the University of Oxford. Henry Maine who was considered the founding figure of modern comparative jurisprudence became the first professor to teach in the University. A scholar by the name Rudolf Schlesinger fled from Germany and introduced the study in the United States of America. Later, he became a professor at Cornell School of Law. He was instrumental in its spread in the USA.  Visit challenge.berkeleylawblogs.org

Today, an international figure recognized around the globe in the study of comparative law is Sujit Choudhry. Over his career life, he has held several positions among them being a professor and Dean of Berkeley Law.

Sujit Choudhry has years of experience in matters regarding constitution building. Choudhry has taken part in several constitutional building processes in countries like Libya, Egypt, Nepal to mention but a few. He has authored several articles and spoken in several countries regarding comparative law.  Click http://www.trudeaufoundation.ca/en/community/sujit-choudhry